if a function is continuous on , it’s saying that for any , s.t.:
Boundedness Theorem
If a function is continuous on a close-interval , then its bounded on that interval.
Proof with Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem.
Suppose that: the function boundless on
If the function is boundless, loop this process, starts with :
- bisect the interval with
- select the boundless half or
- select a point making this half boundless to build a sequence
- continue this process with
And finally we have a infinite bounded sequence and an unbounded sequence s.t.:
- converge to some number (Bolzano Weierstrass Theorem)
- is unbounded, which contradicts to (Heine Theorem)
So the function is bounded on
Intermediate Value Theorem
IVT
If a function is continuous on a close-interval , then for any intermediate value , there’s some value making that
Proof
Build nested intervals with this process:
- bisect the interval with
- if , stop.
- select the half making
- continue this process
So we get a nested interval , which locate exactly one real number , and (Nested Interval Theorem). As the function is continuous on , with Heine’s Theorem:
So we have another set of nested intervals that locate a unique number, which can only be since . (Nested Interval Theorem)
Extreme Value Theorem
Extreme Value Theorem
If a function is continuous on , then there’s a maxima and minima in .
As Boundedness Theorem said, the function is bounded, so the function has a supremum and infimum, w.r.t. Dedekind Completeness Theorem. If the supremum is .
Suppose . is also a continuous function, thus it’s also bounded. Suppose is an upper bound of on :
so is also an upper bound for on , which contradicts to the setting that is the supremum. So there must be some value s.t. .
Mean Value Theorems
Fermat’s Lemma
Fermat's Lemma
derivative on maxima / minima must be zero
Proof:
Suppose is a maxima.
It said that:
Rolle’s MVT
Rolle's MVT
if function is continuous on and , then:
A function is continuous on , then with Extreme Value Theorem, there must be a maxima , and then with Fermat’s Lemma,
Lagrange MVT
Lagrange MVT
If function is continuous on , then:
, which saids the derivative on some intermediate point concludes the change of endpoint.
Proof:
build a flat function containing to apply Rolle’s MVT:
So that
So with Rolle’s MVT,
Cauchy MVT
Cauchy MVT
if function are both continuous on , then:
construct a function whose derivative is in the form that fit the theorem:
so by Rolle’s MVT:
MVT for Integrals
MVT for Integrals
If function is continuous on , then the mean integral is an intermediate value of
is continuous on , so with Boundedness Theorem, is bounded:
then with IVT:
Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
if is continuous at
accumulation function is one of the antiderivative
Integration is difference:
Proof:
So any original function of , denoted by , can be represented by adding some constant to :
substituting with , we know the constant is
substituting with , then the integration of from to is the difference of the value of the endpoints of any antiderivative :