Definition
if a function is continuous on , it’s saying that for any , s.t.:
Boundedness Theorem
If a function is continuous on a close-interval , then its bounded on that interval.
Proof with Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem.
Suppose that: the function boundless on
If the function is boundless, loop this process, starts with :
- bisect the interval with
- select the boundless half or
- select a point making this half boundless to build a sequence \left{ x\_{n} \right}
- continue this process with
And finally we have a infinite bounded sequence \left{ x\_{n} \right} and an unbounded sequence s.t.:
- converge to some number (Bolzano Weierstrass Theorem)
- is unbounded, which contradicts to (Heine Theorem)
So the function is bounded on
Intermediate Value Theorem
IVT
If a function is continuous on a close-interval , then for any intermediate value , there’s some value making that
Proof
Build nested intervals with this process:
- bisect the interval with
- if , stop.
- select the half making u \in \left\[ f(a\_{n+1}), f(b\_{n+1}) \right]
- continue this process
So we get a nested interval \left{ a\_{n}, b\_{n} \right}, which locate exactly one real number , and (Nested Interval Theorem). As the function is continuous on , with Heine’s Theorem:
\begin{align} \lim\_{ n \to \infty } f(a\_{n}) & = f(\lim\_{ n \to a\_{n} } a\_{n}) = f(c) \\ \lim\_{ n \to \infty } f(b\_{n}) & = f(\lim\_{ n \to b\_{n} } b\_{n}) = f(c) \\ \implies \lim\_{ n \to \infty } \left\[ f(a\_{n}) - f(b\_{n}) \right] & = \lim\_{ n \to \infty } f(a\_{n}) - \lim\_{ n \to \infty } f(b\_{n}) = 0 \end{align}So we have another set of nested intervals \left{ f(a\_{n}), f(b\_{n}) \right} that locate a unique number, which can only be since u \in \left\[ f(a\_{n}), f(b\_{n}) \right], \forall n \in \mathbb{Z}. (Nested Interval Theorem)
Extreme Value Theorem
Extreme Value Theorem
If a function is continuous on , then there’s a maxima and minima in .
As Boundedness Theorem said, the function is bounded, so the function has a supremum and infimum, w.r.t. Dedekind Completeness Theorem. If the supremum is .
Suppose . is also a continuous function, thus it’s also bounded. Suppose is an upper bound of on :
so is also an upper bound for on , which contradicts to the setting that is the supremum. So there must be some value s.t. .
Mean Value Theorems
Fermat’s Lemma
Fermat's Lemma
derivative on maxima / minima must be zero
Proof:
Suppose is a maxima.
It said that:
Rolle’s MVT
Rolle's MVT
if function is continuous on and , then:
A function is continuous on , then with Extreme Value Theorem, there must be a maxima , and then with Fermat’s Lemma,
Lagrange MVT
Lagrange MVT
If function is continuous on , then:
, which saids the derivative on some intermediate point concludes the change of endpoint.
Proof:
build a flat function containing to apply Rolle’s MVT:
So that
So with Rolle’s MVT,
Cauchy MVT
Cauchy MVT
if function are both continuous on , then:
construct a function whose derivative is in the form that fit the theorem:
\begin{align} h(x) & = f(x) \left\[ g(b) - g(a) \right] - g(x)\left\[ f(b) - f(a) \right] \\ h(a) & = f(a)g(b) - f(b)g(a) \\ h(b) & = f(a)g(b) - f(b)g(a) \end{align}so by Rolle’s MVT:
MVT for Integrals
MVT for Integrals
If function is continuous on , then the mean integral is an intermediate value of
is continuous on , so with Boundedness Theorem, is bounded:
then with IVT:
Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
if is continuous at
accumulation function is one of the antiderivative
Integration is difference:
Proof:
Prove it by MVT for Integrals:
So any original function of , denoted by , can be represented by adding some constant to :
substituting with , we know the constant is
substituting with , then the integration of from to is the difference of the value of the endpoints of any antiderivative :
Prerequisite of differentiable
it must be continuous to be derivable, or equivalently, differentiable.
if is differentiable, then is also an infinitesimal — which implies that is continuous.